Portfolio item number 1
Short description of portfolio item number 1
Short description of portfolio item number 1
Short description of portfolio item number 2
Published in Atmospheric Environment, 1998
Recommended citation: Kuhn, M., Haslhofer, J., Nickus, U., Schellander, H. (1998). "Seasonal development of ion concentration in a high alpine snow pack." Atmospheric Environment, Volume 32, Issue 23, 1 December 1998, Pages 4041-4051..
Download Paper
Published in Eigenverlag, ZAMG, 2004
Recommended citation: Schellander, H.. (1997). "Die Bestimmung von mittleren Anbruchhöhen für Lawinen in Tirol." Eigenverlag, ZAMG, 2004, Innsbruck, Austria..
Published in Wildbach-, Lawinen-, Erosions- Und Steinschlagschutz, 2017
Recommended citation: Winkler, M., Gruber, S. Schellander, H (2017). "Meteorological Assessment and Extreme Value Analysis of Historical Avalanche Winters in Tirol: 1916/17, 1934/35, and 1950/51." Wildbach-, Lawinen-, Erosions- Und Steinschlagschutz, Volume 179, Number 81, 132--145, in german.
Published in Natural Hazards, 2018
Recommended citation: Schellander, H., Hell, T. "Modeling snow depth extremes in Austria." Nat Hazards 94, 1367–1389 (2018).
Download Paper
Published in International Snow Science Workshop, 2018, Innsbruck, Austria, 2018
Recommended citation: Schellander, H., & Hell, T. (2018). "Bivariate spatial modeling of snow depth and snow water equivalent extremes in Austria." International Snow Science Workshop, 2018, Innsbruck, Austria..
Download Paper
Published in Earth and Space Science, 2019
Recommended citation: Schellander, H., Lieb, A., & Hell, T. (2019). "Error Structure of Metastatistical and Generalized Extreme Value Distributions for Modeling Extreme Rainfall in Austria." Earth and Space Science. 6, 1616–1632..
Download Paper
Published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2021
Recommended citation: Winkler, M., Schellander, H., and Gruber, S.: "Snow water equivalents exclusively from snow depths and their temporal changes: the Δsnow model." Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1165–1187, 2021.
Download Paper
Published in Advances in Science and Research , 2021
Recommended citation: Schellander, H., Winkler, M., and Hell, T. (2021). "Towards a reproducible snow load map – an example for Austria." dv. Sci. Res., 18, 135–144..
Download Paper
Published in Weather and Climate Extremes, 2023
Recommended citation: Falkensteiner, M-A., Schellander, H., Ehrensperger, G., & Hell, T. (2023). "Accounting for seasonality in the metastatistical extreme value distribution." Weather and Climate Extremes, Volume 42, December 2023, 100601..
Download Paper
Published in Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Tromso, Norway, 2024, 2024
Recommended citation: Schroeder M., Prinz, R., Binder, M., Winkler, M., Schellander, H. (2024). "Continuous Snow Water Equivalent Monitoring on Glaciers using Cosmic Ray Neutron Sensor Technology: A Case Study on Hintereisferner, Austria." Proceedings, International Snow Science Workshop, Tromso, Norway, 2024.
Download Paper
Published:
SThe wrong estimation of daily rainfall extremes can have severe consequences in hydrological and engineering applications. Up to date, the Generalized Extreme Value distribution (GEV) is considered the de-facto standard for the estimation of daily rainfall extremes, although there exist some evidence that fitting yearly maxima might violate the asymptotic assumption underlying extreme value theory. To overcome this problem, the Metastatistical Extreme Value distribution (MEV) was recently proposed. With the MEV, the distribution of the bulk of the daily rainfall data (“ordinary events”) is considered to be Weibull right-tail equivalent, describing the intensity of daily rainfall. By additionally considering the number of wet days in a year as random variable, daily rainfall occurrence can be taken into account simultaneously. Recent advances in the study of extreme rainfall showed that the MEV should be preferred over the GEV for the estimation of daily rainfall extremes, whenever the number of years used for fitting is small compared to the return period of interest. In the present study, a break-even analysis for a large number of sample years and return periods for Aus- trian daily rainfall data shows that the MEV outperforms the GEV when the number of sample years is smaller than, and the estimated return period is larger than 30 years. This advantage almost vanishes when smooth spatial extreme value modeling is performed with the MEV instead of the GEV. However, the computational effort is drastically decreased when using an averaged version of the MEV.
Published:
Published:
Undergraduate course, University 1, Department, 2014
This is a description of a teaching experience. You can use markdown like any other post.
Workshop, University 1, Department, 2015
This is a description of a teaching experience. You can use markdown like any other post.